1951 (10) TMI 29

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed by the defendant-appellant against a decree of the Lower Appellate Court, whereby a decree of the original Court has been reversed and the plaintiff-respondent's claim for the possession of a house decreed. 2. The plaint alleges that the appellant on Amarbad 1, 1349 Fasli: June 6, 1940 married the respondent;, at the time of the marriage the house in dispute was conveyed to her in lieu of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... om; which later she came to know to belong to defendant No. 2; and was on Bahman 18, 1351 Fasli: December 21, 1941 dispossessed; hence this suit to recover the house. 3. The appellant has filed a written statement denying the marriage with the plaintiff-respondent and transfer of the house in lieu of dower. He has also asserted ownership of the house in himself and having rightly mortgaged it. He .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a' (marriage certificate) was compulsorily registrable and whether in absence of such a registration it was admissible in evidence. It held that as under Section 116 of the Hyderabad Transfer of Property Act the provision of S. 110 of the Act about the registration of a deed of gift was not applicable to Mohammadans, there can be oral gift; but if the transaction was reduced into writing, it w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X