9911796707
TMI Blog2020 (8) TMI 290X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... agreement is dated 6.6.2011. Since a doubt had arisen as to whether the houseboat registered in the name of the petitioner's husband at Kottayam and the houseboat of the petitioner, which is the subject matter of proceedings under Exhibit P3 are different, the learned counsel for the petitioner was required to produce evidence that the very same houseboat was registered at Kottayam - the cont ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... missions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner - Petition dismissed. - WP(C).No.24206 OF 2018(A) - - - Dated:- 7-8-2020 - THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FOR THE PETITIONER : BY ADVS. SRI.AJI V.DEV SRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV SMT.O.A.NURIYA FOR THE RESPONDENT : R1 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN JUDGMENT Petitioner is the owner of a houseboat. She claims t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Yamuna' with port registration number KIV/ALP/HB/505/11, without registration and had failed to respond to the statutory notice issued on 7.5.2018. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner endeavoured to make it appear that the petitioner leased out the boat to her husband under Exhibit P1 agreement and her husband having remitted luxury tax at Kottayam, Exhibit P3 is invalid. The learned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the petitioner's husband at Kottayam and the houseboat of the petitioner, which is the subject matter of proceedings under Exhibit P3 are different, the learned counsel for the petitioner was required to produce evidence that the very same houseboat was registered at Kottayam. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that in spite of best efforts, the petitioner had not furni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
