2000 (3) TMI 1111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... demolished the khokhas and other structures put on by them. Two applications were filed under Sections 4, 5 and 7 of the Haryana Public Premises Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1972. During the pendency of those proceedings the Appellants took steps to eject the Respondents from the land in question and demolished the khokhas constructed by them. The High Court proceeded on the basis that e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ould not have granted relief in the manner it has been made. It is also pointed out that there are several other strong reasons for the Respondents to have acted in the manner they did. Question of examining the title of the parties does not arise at all as admittedly Respondents were in possession of the property in question and put up structures thereon. On that admitted position High Court took .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X