9911796707
TMI Blog1925 (4) TMI 4X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... which are set out in the order of reference. The matter is really a very simple one. The plaintiff was the owner of a mango grove of which she gave the crops to the defendants for three years at an annual price of ₹ 400. The defendants took the crops for the first year and paid the price. They took the crops for the second year but did not pay, with the result of a suit by the plaintiff for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ow it any force at all would be to create a situation in which no one could ever possibly know whether a particular agreement dealt with movable property or whether it did not. This is sufficiently plain from the consideration that it is entirely impossible to know exactly at what moment a crop comes into existence or whether it was or was not in existence at any particular moment or on any partic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oondakul Nagireddi (1871) 6 M.H.C. 71 a case in which the dispute was about an agreement providing for the drawing of toddy from palm trees. We need not deal with that case any further than to say that we are unable to appreciate the distinction between the fruit of a tree and the juice which is drawn from the trunk of that tree. In both cases there is obviously a question of the produce of the tr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n of the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes by saying that a contract for sale of mango and other fruit crop not in existence at the time of contract is indubitably a contract with regard to movable property only and as such does not require registration. 4. The second question is whether an agreement in writing, but unregistered, executed by the purchaser of the crop binding himself to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
