9911796707
TMI Blog1989 (7) TMI 85X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... erence of the following questions to this court : " (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessment made by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment years 1981-82, 1.982-83 and 1983-84 could not be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue ? (2) Whether, on the fact ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was not perverse and against the evidence on record ? (5) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the orders made by the Incometax Officer were not erroneous even though it contained an apparent error of facts as also being stereo-typed and by which he accepted what the assessee stated without ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... centre existed at the address given and as the bank account produced by the assessee needed elaborate examination, the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer were prejudicial to the Revenue. It may be noted here that the income which was disclosed by the respondent was alleged to have been derived by her from a coaching centre. The Commissioner, has set aside the order of the Income-tax Office ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
