Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (12) TMI 1126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ass orders on the application of the Petitioner, in accordance with the terms of the Scheme, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Petition disposed off. - Writ Petition No. 16315 of 2020 And Writ Petition No. 16539 of 2020 - - - Dated:- 21-12-2020 - SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR AND SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO Petitioner and Advocate : Harish Kumar Rasineni Respondent and Advocate : Harinath N (Asst Solicitor General), M.V.J.K. Kumar (Sr SC For CEC Ser Tax ) COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) These Writ Petitions are disposed of through Blue Jeans video conferencing App. 1) In Writ Petition No. 16315 of 2020, the Petitioner is an individual. The Peti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4) The Respondents, after appearance, filed a counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit, the Respondents took the stand that the letter, dated 20.03.2019, which is said to be the basis for the application of the Petitioner under the Scheme, was a bogus letter and as such, the Petitioner could not have applied under the Scheme. Secondly, the application of the Petitioner did not set-out any details regarding the quantification of the sum of ₹ 7,83,856/- in the declaration and in the absence of furnishing such details, there could be a possibility of revenue loss to the exchequer. On these two grounds, the application of the Petitioner is said to have been rejected. 5) Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni, learned Counsel for the Petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e had rejected your application. Also refer to the Anantapur Divisional Office letter vide C.No. V/31/07/2016-17-SIR, dated 20-06-2019 wherein you are directed to pay the Service Tax of ₹ 7,83,856/- along with penalty and applicable interest. 8) The facts relating to W.P. No. 16539 of 2020 is that the letter of rejection, dated 24.07.2020, shows that there was quantification prior to 30.06.2019. In the said letter, paragraph 2 reads as under: In this regard, it is bring to notice that where the Designated Committee had rejected your application. Also refer to the Anantapur Divisional Office letter vide C.No. V/31/07/2016-17-SIR, dated 20-06-2019 wherein you are directed to pay the Service Tax of ₹ 12,12,233/- along wit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates