2021 (1) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rajasekar For the Respondents : Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, Government Advocate COMMON ORDER Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter. 2. The petitioner challenges orders dated 11.09.2020 passed by R2/The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) rejecting the petitioners' appeals on the ground that they are bar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Section 19(11) were dismissed in U.S.A. Agencies V. The Commercial Tax Officer (W.P.No.909 of 2013 etc. batch dated 17.07.2013) and the matters thereafter travelled to Supreme Court wherein the vires of provision was again upheld in ALD Automobile P. Ltd Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (2018 3 GSTL 230). The judgment of the Supreme Court is dated 12.10.2018. It would have been appropriate for the petit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o the 25% of the disputed tax already remitted by it. 6. Ms.Madhri does not express any serious objection to this action. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed setting aside the order of R2 dated 11.09.2020. The petitioner is directed to remit a further 25% of the disputed taxes within a period of three (3) weeks from today. Upon proof of remittance of the same, the appeal shall be resto .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X