TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 555X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lowed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h order should be passed preferably within a period of three month from the date of submission of copy of this order by the petitioner. 3. After this Court remitted the matter to the respondent no.2 with a direction to pass a fresh order strictly in accordance with law, the order impugned in the present writapplication came to be passed dated 11 th November, 2020. 4. Mr. Soparkar, the learned senior counsel has raised manifold contentions questioning the legality and validity of the impugned order passed by the respondent no.2 herein. We were quite reluctant to entertain this writapplication as the writapplicant has an alternative remedy of filing a statutory appeal under Section73 of the GVAT Act 2003. However, keepin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ds, it would have formed part of the definition. Assuming that the definition of purchase price is exhaustive and would include the statutory taxes and duties, in that case, there was no necessity for including specific taxes/duties like duties under the Central Excise Tariff Act and the Customs Act. The legislative intent is, therefore, clear, that is, to include only the duties paid under the Central Excise Tariff Act and the Customs Act within the ambit of "purchase price" as defined under section 2(18) of the GVAT Act. 8. When the word "includes" is used in a definition as in the case of section 2(18) of the GVAT Act, it is clear that the legislature does not intend to restrict the definition; it makes the definitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r", once it is held that the purchase price does not include the value added tax component, it follows that calculation of input tax credit under section 11(3)(b) of the GVAT Act is also required to be made by excluding the value added tax component from the total turnover of the dealer. 5. On cursory perusal of the judgment of this Court in the case of M/s. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (Supra), it appears that the amounts collected by the dealers under a statutory obligation, cannot be a part of their taxable turnover. In such circumstances, Mr. Soparkar, the learned senior counsel has vehemently submitted that the taxable turnover of sale would not include the amount of service tax separately collected by the petitionerassessee. It is fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|