1988 (9) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t"), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, lndore Bench, has referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessment order passed in compliance with the directions of the Inspecting Asssistant Commissioner under section 144B could not be revised by the Commissione .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ete the proposed addition. The Income-tax Officer thereafter framed the assessment order in compliance with the direction given by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Income-tax, exercising powers under section 263 of the Act, held that the order passed by the Income-tax Officer in pursuance of the direction given by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner was pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t reference and it is at the instance of the Revenue that the aforesaid question of law has been referred to this court for its opinion. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the parties conceded that the matter arising in this case was covered by a decision of this court in CIT v. Vithal Textiles [1989] 175 ITR 629 (Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 38 of 1986), where a Division Bench of this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X