9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (2) TMI 599X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... subject to conditions imposed. The conditions contained in the order dated 25th November, 2019 shall continue to apply on the Petitioner. Ld. counsel for the Petitioner submits that he does not dispute this position. Accordingly, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Consulate General of India in Sydney shall ensure that the Petitioner strictly abides by the conditions contained in the order dated 25th November, 2019 upheld by this Court vide order dated 29th January, 2020 - Since the new passport has now been issued for a period of five years, the old passport which was suspended shall now be treated as cancelled. Petition disposed off. - W.P.(C) 11072/2020 & CM APPLs. 34572/2020, 34573/2020, 34574/2020 - - - Dated:- 25-1-2021 - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o the intervenor. 4. A perusal of the impleadment shows that there are matrimonial disputes between the Petitioner and his wife leading to complaints being filed. In one such complaint filed by Ms.Vaid, the Petitioner sought anticipatory bail which was dismissed. Since he was already in Australia, finally he travelled to India and was even arrested. The Petitioner then sought permission to travel to Australia which was initially dismissed on 26th August 2019. However, in a Revision petition filed by the Petitioner, vide order dated 25th November 2019, the Sessions Court granted permission to travel subject to the following conditions: 13. In view of such observations, this court passes the following directions: i) That the ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... case the applicant violates any of the condition, then the ld. Trial Court is at liberty to pass any order in accordance with the law including the order to reconsider the earlier orders passed. 5. The above order was challenged by the Petitioner before this court in Crl.M.C 6194/2019 titled Kanika Vaid v. State (NCT of Delhi) Anr. The same was dismissed by a Ld Single Judge vide order dated 29th January 2020. The operative portion of the said order is set out below: As regards the prayer that has been made by the petitioner seeking the release of the said amount of ₹ 5,00,000/- which has been deposited by the respondent no.2 in terms of directions dated 27.01.2020 in the present petition, in as much as, the proceedi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pouse of the respondent no.2 and of the child born of the wedlock between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 have not been given to the Australian Consulate and to the Indian Consulate, the details in relation thereto, shall be provided by the respondent no.2 to both Consulates before he leaves the country. No further directions are called for. The petition stands disposed of. 6. It is, thus, clear from the above directions issued that the conditions contained in the order dated 25th November, 2019 shall continue to apply on the Petitioner. Ld. counsel for the Petitioner submits that he does not dispute this position. Accordingly, the Ministry of External Affairs and the Consulate General of India in Sydney shall ensur ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
