9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (2) TMI 599X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment application, CM Appl. No. 2670/2021, which has been filed by Ms. Kanika Vaid - the wife of the Petitioner in this matter. Various orders passed by the Court in the criminal proceedings which are pending against the Petitioner have been placed on record. It is her submission that the renewal of the passport was subject to various conditions as contained in the order dated 25th November, 2019, passed by the Special Judge (NDPS), North, Rohini Courts, Delhi in the revision petition filed by the Petitioner. She further submits that this order has been upheld by this Court vide order dated 29th January, 2020 in Crl.M.C 6194/2019 titled Kanika Vaid v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr. However, though the old passport has been suspended and a new o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e numbers and the place of abode within 10 days to the ld. Trial Court as well as to the Consulate General of India in the said country; iv) That the applicant shall not visit any other country except India and Australia without obtaining prior permission of the court; v) That the applicant shall submit his passport within 48 hours immediately to the office of Consulate General of India in Australia and whenever he shall have to come to India, he shall have to apply for the release of his passport; vi) That the applicant shall appear either himself or through his counsel on each date of hearing unless the presence of the applicant is unavoidable, as per directions to be passed, by the ld. Trial Court. Ld. Counsel for the applicant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng the course of the *said maintenance proceedings. No further orders in relation to the said aspect are called for. As regards the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner that the respondent no.2 be not permitted to travel abroad for his employment, as rightly observed by the learned Revisional Court vide the impugned order dated 25 .11.2019, no such restriction as sought by the respondent no.2, is presently required to be imposed in view of the specific conditions imposed vide para 13 of the impugned order dated 25.11.2019, which shall continue. It has however, been submitted on behalf of the petitioner and not refuted on behalf of the respondent no.2 that the respondent no.2 has since been issued a fresh passport, the copy of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
