9911796707
TMI Blog1987 (11) TMI 17X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the petitioner, for having filed a return of income for the assessment year 1976-77, declaring his income at Rs. 31,820. The allegation is that in another firm known as Satinder Singh Sarbjit Singh, two minor sons of the petitioner, were admitted to the benefits of the partnership and both the sons had earned profits to the extent of Rs. 14,660 for that year. Objection was raised by the audit of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and PH, were tendered in evidence. At the time of framing the charge, it was brought to the notice of the trial court that the order of respondent No. 1, directing the inclusion of profits of the minors in the return of the petitioner, was set aside by the Appellate Tribunal, vide its order dated July 29, 1982, wherein it was held that reassessment by the Income-tax Officer or the learned appellat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ction 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the order dated July 29, 1982 (annexure p-3), decided by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, it was held that section 64(1)(iii) of the said Act came on the statute when sub-section (1) of section 64 was substituted by section 13 of the Taxation Laws (Amendment') Act, 1975, and this substituted section was effective with effect from April 1, 1976. With ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
