2016 (12) TMI 1842

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd Kr. K.N. Ahuja, Advs. ORDER 1. The ground urged by the revenue in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act relates to the interest on the mobilization amount claimed by the assessee. It is contended that recognition of revenue by the assessee was improper and having regard to the hybrid method of accounting adopted over the years, the interest amount had to be treated as income. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntious nature of the matter even though the assessee had adopted hybrid method of accounting. The relevant findings of the ITAT are as follows: "We have perused the relevant pages of the paper book and are convinced that as the amount has not been crystallized the same cannot be treated as income in the hands of the assessee. The assessee being a Government undertaking has been following a syste .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as questioned as there could be no doubt that under the contract, the mobilization advance was given by the assessee and therefore it was entitled to the interest. 4. It is evident from the above discussion that the entire matter is contentious in the sense that the third party - RPCL - which was awarded the contract claimed that it had performed it in accordance with the agreement with the parti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X