TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 23X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ,Mudit Agarwal For the Respondent : Manish Misra ORDER Heard Mr. J. N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mudit Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manish Misra, learned Counsel for opposite party Nos.1, 2 and Issue notice to the opposite party No.4 returnable at an early date. Notice to opposite party No.5 stands dispensed with at this stage and may be issued subs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rther directed that proceedings before the Settlement Commission would remain stayed till disposal of the writ petition. The aforesaid writ petition after remand is pending consideration. It is further submitted that subsequently vide order dated 20.3.2019, the registration of petitioner's society was cancelled w.e.f. 1.4.2008. The said order was challenged in Writ Petition No.11887 (MB) of 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Assessment Year 2013- 14 has been issued in view of the fact that vide order dated 20.3.2019, the registration of petitioner's Trust has already been cancelled under Section 12AA of the Act and there being no interim order in Writ Petition No.11887 (MB) of 2019, the impugned notice is valid in law, particularly in view of the reasoning that as a result of exemption claimed under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2019. Once the aforesaid proceedings are already pending consideration of this Court, it does not appear to reason as to why the fresh re-asseement notice was required to be issued at this stage. The matter requires consideration for which the opposite parties are granted four weeks' time to file detailed counter affidavit. List thereafter alongwith Writ Petition Nos.5195 (MB) of 2017, 11887 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|