Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (4) TMI 209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ic share was mentioned in the purchase deed, the share of co-owners are equal. On the death of one of the co-owners, three legal heirs became owners of the property along with surviving co-owner with their cumulative share which cannot be more than 50%. CIT(A) further held that the total income as defined in section 2(45) of the Act is to be computed as per provision of the Act. The income is taxable in the hand of the person to whom it belongs. A literal interpretation of the provisions leads to the conclusion that a right person is liable to pay tax on his income and no option is available to tax income in the hands of person other than one in whose hands it is taxable. There is no ambiguity in sect ion 2(45) of the Act that only a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... me Tax (Appeal)-13, Ahmedabad has erred in arriving at a conclusion that the appellant has one-half (50%) share in the property. 2. On the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in making an assumption without any supporting evidence that when no specific share is mentioned in the purchase deed than legal position is that share of all the co-owners are equal. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual. The assessee not filed return of income for the impugned assessment year. The Assessing Officer (AO) on the basis of AIR information that during the relevant financial year the assessee sold immoveable property and earned capital gain. There .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted that the assessee has calculated capital gain on 25% of sale consideration and remaining 75% was shared with legal heirs of co-owner, namely Shri Harman Bhai Patel. The AO was of the view that assessee and legal heirs of co-owner were was entitled for 50% of share each. The AO worked out capital gain on the basis of 50% of the sale consideration in assessment order dated 27.12.2016 passed under section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 3. On appeal before the ld. CIT(A) the action of the AO was confirmed. Further aggrieved, the assessee has filed present appeal before this Tribunal. 4. We have heard the submission of ld. Authorised Representative (AR) of the assessee and Sr. Departmental Representative(Sr. DR) for the Revenue and perused .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (A) also disregarded the documentary evidences and confirmed the action of the AO. The Ld. AR of the appellant submits that he has proved his case beyond doubt by placing documentary evidence on record that only 1/4th consideration was received on sale of land. 6. On the other hand, the ld. Sr. DR for the Revenue submits that the asset/land was purchased by two persons i.e. Shri Babubhai Patel and Shri Harmanbhai Patel. Since plot was purchased by two persons, thus, the assessee was having 50% ownership in the land. At the time of sale, the assessee claimed that he received only 25% of the sale consideration. 7. We have considered the rival submission of the parties and have gone through the orders of Lower Authorities. The AO reopene .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ocumentary evidence filed by the assessee. Before the ld. CIT(A) the assessee furnished the affidavit of Shri Pravinchandra Harmanbhai Patel and Shri Yogendrakumar Harmanbhai Patel. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the action of AO by taking view that when no specific share was mentioned in the purchase deed, the share of co-owners are equal. On the death of one of the co-owners, three legal heirs became owners of the property along with surviving co-owner with their cumulative share which cannot be more than 50%. The ld. CIT(A) further held that the total income as defined in section 2(45) of the Act is to be computed as per provision of the Act. The income is taxable in the hand of the person to whom it belongs. A literal interpretation of the pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates