TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 282X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s in proceeding with the complaint no.1262 of 2020 made under the provisions of Section 5(5) of PMLA as the same will not amount to any coercive step in terms of the provisional order of attachment. The matter can be more effectively heard after calling for affidavits - Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed within a period of four week from date. Reply, if any, thereto be filed by two weeks ther ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rtion of the interim order is as follows: This Court is of the view that since an adjournment has been prayed for on behalf of the respondents, the respondent should not take any steps in terms of the impugned order until the matter is heard out on merits. The petitioners thereafter wanted to withdraw the writ petition as, according to the petitioners, the order of provisional attachment d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ve to withdraw the writ petition. Faced with this situation, the petitioners do not intend to withdraw the writ petition. The respondent no.3, on finding that the petitioners are no more interested to withdraw the writ petition and intend to proceed with the same, raises the maintainability point of the writ petition on several grounds, including the jurisdictional ground. The respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cating the interim order made by the respondent nos.2, 3, 4 and 13 is concerned, the same cannot be vacated at this stage, particularly in view of the fact that such interim order is continuing from 21st October, 2020 and no vacating application has been made by the said respondents in the meantime. Pendency of the writ petition will, however, not be an embargo on the respondents in proceeding ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|