9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (4) TMI 866X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pected to deposit 20% of the total amount. In this case, the argument of Mr. Soparkar is that he has been asked to deposit ₹ 100 crore being 20% of the total demand. This according to Mr. Soparkar could not have been done. According to Mr. Soparkar, his client is expected to deposit 20% of the disputed amount and not the entire amount of demand. The second limb of his submission is that a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... TICE ILESH J. VORA MR B S SOPARKAR FOR THE PETITIONER ORDER PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA 1. We have heard Mr. Bandish Soparkar, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant. 2. It appears that a notice of demand under Section-156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [for short The Act, 1961'] dated 26/12/2019 came to be issued to the writ-applicant. This n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assessee wants stay against the recovery of demand, then, he is expected to deposit 20% of the total amount. In this case, the argument of Mr. Soparkar is that he has been asked to deposit ₹ 100 crore being 20% of the total demand. This according to Mr. Soparkar could not have been done. According to Mr. Soparkar, his client is expected to deposit 20% of the disputed amount and not the enti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
