TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 1039X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... athi ORDER P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the rival parties. Perused appeal. 2. By this appeal, the following questions of law are sought to be raised by the appellant- Revenue: "(A) Whether on the facts and on in the circumstances of the case and law, the I.T.A.T. is right in directing the A.O. to tax the dividend income on net basis? (B) Whether on the facts and in the circumst ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court in C.I.T. v. Acme Manufacturing Co., 249 ITR 460; C.I.T. v. Chemet, 240 ITR 624; and C.I.T. v. Gannon Dunkerly & Co., 114 CTR 56. 4. So far question-C is concerned the same is also covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of C.I.T. v. Narendra D. Desai, (2008) 214 CTR 190. 5. In the above view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in this appeal. Appeal is dis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|