1987 (3) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... raises the following question : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the perquisites allowed to the foreign technicians would not be covered by section 40(c)(iii)/40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and thereby deleting the disallowance made under section 40(c)(iii)/40(a)(v) to the extent of Rs. 8,310, Rs. 12,232 and Rs. 17,883 fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The question referred to us arises out of this finding of the Tribunal. The provisos to section 40(c)(iii) and section 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read, in identical terms, thus : Provided further that nothing in this sub-clause shall apply to any expenditure which results directly or indirectly in the provision of any benefit or amenity or perquisite to an employee whose income cha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssees' foreign technicians would receive salary which would be " nil " for the purpose of the aforementioned proviso. The perquisites paid to them would, therefore, not be covered by the provisions of sections 40(c)(iii) and 40(a)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, the question is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee. No order as to costs. - - TaxTMI - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X