TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 1977X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hable under Sections 409, 420, 109, 120B of IPC, 1860 Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) 11 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - HELD THAT:- Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant and further considering the fact that there is no direct evidence against the present applicant, the benefit of anticipatory bail is extended to the applicant. Antic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... court of Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988) and it is registered as Special Criminal Case No. 61/2018 in which warrant of arrest was issued against the applicant on 05.12.2018 and 29.03.2019 and now the case is fixed for appearance of the applicant before the said court on 15.05.2019. 5. As per version of the prosecution, the applicant was posted as Managing Director of Nagrik Aap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... evidence that he deceived fraudulently and dishonestly to any person. (ii) The applicant is also charge-sheeted for commission of offence under Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) & 11 of the Act, 1988, but there is no prima facie evidence that he obtained for himself any pecuniary advantage or valuable thing. (iii) The FIR was lodged in the year 2015 and no interrogation was made from the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary with utmost circumspection. 9. Considering the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant and further considering the fact that there is no direct evidence against the present applicant, I am inclined to extend benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicant. 10. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|