TMI Blog2021 (3) TMI 1217X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Mathur with Mr. Pankaj Ghiya, Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Deepak Garg. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Anand Sharma. ORDER 1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 2. Case No. IV(06)161/AE/Alwar/2020 was registered at CGST Commissionrate Alwar, for offence under Section 132 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able. 4. Counsel for the Union of India has opposed the bail application. It is contended that petitioner had made fake invoices without there being any supply of goods and in the above mode they have wrongly claimed GST to the tune of Rs. 7.09 crore. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|