9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (9) TMI 721X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Amit Daga, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and perused the record. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the order dated 01.05.2014 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi in Complaint Case No. 828 of 2013 (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Vs. Rajendra Babela), under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... omplaint, learned Magistrate, after considering the allegations made in the complaint and making requisite enquiry under Sections 200 CrPC and 202 CrPC, has summoned the applicant to face trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act vide order dated 18.11.2013. Against the said order dated 18.11.2013, the applicant preferred an application under Section 482 CrPC before this Court and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as submitted that the cheque in question has not been presented before the bank for payment by the Opposite Party No.2 within prescribed period, as such, proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act could not be drawn against him, as such, impugned order is bad in the eye of law and liable to be set aside. Per contra, learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , proper and legal and do not call for any interference. Having considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, I am of the considered opinion that all the submissions/ objections can very well be raised during the course of trial and not at this stage, here only prima facie case is to be seen, as such, impugned order dated 01.05.2014 needs no interference by this Court ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
