9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 2047X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er herein is having a right to agitate the matter before the adjudicating Authority by raising all the points raised before this Court and seek for raising the attachment. When such statutory remedy is available to the petitioner before the Adjudicating Authority, who is a fact finding authority as well, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition that too, challenging the provisiona ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondent. 3.According to the petitioner, when the very allegation of loss of revenue to the Government is confined to ₹ 53.50 crores in terms of waiver of interest by the State Bank of India Bank to HTL, as stated in the counter affidavit filed by the CBI before this Court in a Criminal Original Petition filed by the petitioner challenging the FIR, the respondent can consider to take so ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t entitled to seek any indulgence from this Court. He further pointed out that though the petitioner has chosen to refer to the counter filed in the Crl.O.P. filed challenging the FIR, he has conveniently omitted to mention about the dismissal of the said Crl.O.P.No.21905 of 2017 by this Court on 05.12.2017. 5.Heard both sides. 6.It is not in dispute that the impugned order is only provision ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
