2005 (10) TMI 604

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Adv. Mr. Sarad Singhania, Adv. Mr. A.P. Dhamija, Adv. Mr. Punit Jain, Adv. Mr. Ram Niwas, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. C.L. Sahu, Adv. O R D E R Delay condoned. 1. One of the questions raised in these Appeals is whether the Civil Court had jurisdiction to entertain the Suit filed by the Respondent for setting aside an order of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as placed upon para 37 of the Judgment in Krishna Kant s case (supra) which reads as follows:- It is directed that the principles enunciated in this judgment shall apply to all pending matters except where decrees have been passed by the trial court and the matters are pending in appeal or second appeal, as the case may be. All suits pending in the trial court shall be governed by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. It is next submitted that some time be given to the Respondent to obtain appropriate orders from the Industrial Court or the Labour Court to which a reference may be made by the State Government. 5. In our view, considering the fact that the Respondents have been working in most cases since 1990 or prior thereto, it would be appropriate that we direct the State Government to make a Referen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X