1986 (2) TMI 55

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ur (hereinafter referred to as " the Tribunal"), the following question has been referred for the opinion of this court: " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the expenditure of Rs. 3,945 incurred on providing meals to its trade constituents and tea and soft drinks, etc., to the customers is not expenditure within the meaning of sect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ertainment and, accordingly, he deleted the addition. The Tribunal while dismissing the departmental appeal has referred the aforesaid question for the opinion of this court. We find that this case is fully covered by the decision of this court in Devichand Bastimal v. CIT[1985] 156 ITR 166 (Raj). In that case, the assessee was carrying on business of " adat " and sale of agricultural commoditie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X