9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 1164X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cations ought not to be entertained and more so, when the case diary and the status report, clearly indicated that the accused (respondent No. 2) is absconding and not cooperating with the investigation. The specious reason of change in circumstances cannot be invoked for successive anticipatory bail applications, once it is rejected by a speaking order and that too by the same Judge. We refrain f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... RDER Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 24.11.2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Crl. O.P. No. 18412 of 2020, granting anticipatory bail to respondent No.2 in connection with FIR No. 153 of 2019 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 436, 302, 307, 149 and 120B of Indian Penal Code. The in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the impugned judgment by the same Judge, who had rejected the second anticipatory bail application, referred to above, vide order dated 24.11.2020 (impugned order). On this occasion, the learned Judge recorded following reasons for acceding to the request for grant of anticipatory bail to respondent No.2. The same read thus: (i) The date of occurrence is 11.11.2019. (ii) Other 13 accused were arr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... quest of respondent No. 2 and granted anticipatory bail, without referring to these crucial facts noted in the status report. None of the reasons cited by the learned Judge, in our opinion, can be said to be just basis to show indulgence to respondent No. 2. As a matter of fact, successive anticipatory bail applications ought not to be entertained and more so, when the case diary and the status re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
