2021 (1) TMI 1164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s) : Mr. Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rajnish Kumar Jha, AOR. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR,  Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Rajarajeswaran, S, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Chadha, Advocate,  Shri. J K Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR. ORDER Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... peaking order dated 29.05.2020 and more importantly taking note of the fact that there was no change in circumstances and the investigation was still incomplete. Respondent No. 2 then moved a third anticipatory bail application being Crl. O.P. No. 18412 of 2020, which has been allowed by the impugned judgment by the same Judge, who had rejected the second anticipatory bail application, referred to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... submitted by the Investigating Officer before the High Court for consideration along with case diary, clearly indicating that custodial interrogation of respondent No. 2 is essential and the investigation is still incomplete. Nevertheless, on the third occasion, the learned Judge acceded to the request of respondent No. 2 and granted anticipatory bail, without referring to these crucial facts note .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X