9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 1973X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not cooperate in investigation during this nine days period. He gave evasive replies and wasted time by making false allegations that he was beaten by the officials of the petitioner. This can be gathered from the application. This cannot be sufficient enough to keep the accused in ED custody. Petition dismissed. - CRL.M.C. 4654/2017 & CRL MA 18544/2017 - - - Dated:- 10-11-2017 - HON'B ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dent had not been cooperating in the investigation. He had not answered the questionnaire put to him by the investigating officer. He refused to make any statement with respect to the questionnaire. He gave evasive replies. It was further contended that some more time was required as certain new documents, including electronic evidence were received from the bank, with which respondent was to be c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... een giving evasive replies cannot be valid grounds to extend the custody. Investigators had interrogated the respondent and had recorded his statement after he joined investigation on receipt of summons even prior to his arrest. Respondent remained in 9 days of effective custody for interrogation which time was sufficient for interrogation, in as much as no sufficient reasons were furnished for fu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... a ground to extend custody remand of the respondent. A perusal of para 17 of the application makes it clear that premises of the respondent was searched on 24th August, 2017 and documents, including digital evidence, were seized. It is also apparent that respondent s statement was recorded even before his arrest. As regards alleged new documents are concerned, averments are vague. It has not be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
