Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (12) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Instruments Act, 1881. So far as parties to the present proceedings are concerned, they are the same parties in all the petitions and the question involved is also the common question, and hence all the petitions are disposed of by this common judgment. 3. Few relevant facts are as under: Opponent No. 1 is the Manager of Shree Trading Corporation which deals in the business of caustic soda at Ahmedabad. Petitioner No. 1 is the Managing Director while petitioner No. 2 is the Director of M/s. Sanchem Enterprise, a registered company under the Companies Act. 4. So far as Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 87 of 1991 is concerned, further facts are that the accused approached the complainant in November 1989 and placed an order for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... after receiving the materials the accused had issued two cheques of Vijaya Bank, Navrangpura Branch, Ahmedabad, dated 10-6-1990 for ₹ 42,809/- and dated 17-6-1990 for ₹ 51,134/- bearing Nos. 443464 and 443467 respectively . The cheques were presented to the banker for collections but the same were dishonoured and hence a notice was given to the petitioners and inspite of that as payment was not made the complainant was obliged to file a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 6. So far as Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 133 of 1991 is concerned, it is alleged in the complaint that the petitioners placed an order for supply of caustic soda which was supplied by the complainant. It is alleged in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... que, its number, date and the bank on which it is drawn is there but complaint is not indicating as to in whose favour the cheque is issued or who is the payee or holder in due course. In absence of requisite detail the Court ought not to have taken cognizance in view of Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which reads as under: 142. Cognizance of offences.--Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (II of 1974): (a) no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Section 138 except upon a complaint, in writing, made by the payee or, as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque; (b) .... (c) .... Clause (a) makes it very clear that the Court can take cogn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates