2019 (10) TMI 1479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ty because firstly a letter purportedly issued by defendant no. 2 asking plaintiff to supply particulars for issuance of C Form is on record. This prima facie reflects that defendant no. 2 was under obligation or at least was having some express or implied contract to issue C Form. Total claim of recovery of ₹ 91,65,975/ of plaintiff includes the amount on account of C Form. Secondly, bill .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2 is not a necessary party as the suit is based upon agreement which was entered into between plaintiff and defendant no. 1. Entire goods were supplied to defendant no. 1. Cheque for value of goods was also issued by defendant no. 1. He submits that defendant no. 2 was never in picture in the transactions between plaintiff and defendant no. 1. In response to submissions of learned Sh. Sharad, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cause firstly a letter purportedly issued by defendant no. 2 asking plaintiff to supply particulars for issuance of C Form is on record. This prima facie reflects that defendant no. 2 was under obligation or at least was having some express or implied contract to issue C Form. Total claim of recovery of ₹ 91,65,975/ of plaintiff includes the amount on account of C Form. Secondly, bills wer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X