Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1983 (9) TMI 71

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rs, both the Commissioner and the assessee applied for reference being made to the High Court. Therefore, for each of the three assessment years, common references have been made for such questions of law as the Tribunal thought should be referred on the applications moved by the Commissioner and the assessee. The law applicable for each of the three assessment years was the Indian I.T. Act, 1922. The questions referred to the High Court in I.T. Rs. Nos. 114 and 115 of 1972 (assessment year 1959-60) are as under : " 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, sum of Rs. 2,19,380 representing the difference between the market value and the cost of acquisition of the shares of the New Central jute Mills Co. Ltd. is liab .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ormerly known as Bharat Bank Ltd. It held a number of shares in various companies and these shares constituted stock-in-trade in the hands of the assessee. Among the shares thus held were 1,24,000 ordinary shares of the New Central Jute Mills Co. Ltd., 12,455 ordinary shares of the Punjab National Bank Ltd. and another lot of 73,900 ordinary shares of the Punjab National Bank Ltd., relevant to the assessment years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62. By resolutions passed on October 31, 1958, September 23, 1959, and September 28, 1960, the assessee declared dividend on its ordinary shares in specie in the shape of shares of the three respective companies being distributed by way of dividend to its shareholders. Thus the dividend declared for each .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... us. We may, therefore, only notice this decision on which strong reliance has been placed. The Bank of India had passed a resolution for increasing its share capital. It offered new shares of Rs. 50 each to its existing shareholders in the proportion of one new share for every three shares held by them at a premium of Rs. 50. The Navjivan Mills Ltd. held 5,000 shares in the said bank and thus became entitled to 1,666 new shares. The Navjivan Mills Ltd. purchased 66 shares and pursuant to a resolution by its board of directors distributed the right to purchase the remaining 1,600 shares among shareholders in the proportion of two shares of the bank for each share held by them in the mills. The assessee, who held 570 shares in the mills an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uing s. 2(6A) of the Act. It held that dividend may be distributed in cash or in specie. It was not concerned with any question as to the value of the specie distributed by way of dividend qua the company declaring the dividend. Distribution of dividend in specie, in our opinion, cannot be regarded as a trading activity, even where what is distributed is stock-in-trade of the assessee. As to what will be the value of the right or thing in the hands of the share-holders is wholly irrelevant for purposes of assessment of profit and loss of the company distributing the asset. We are, therefore, of the view that the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that there was no question of profit and loss as far as the assessee is concerned w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al [1961] 41 ITR 275 (SC), referred to earlier, to hold that the rebate is to be worked out on the basis of the market value of the shares distributed by way of dividend. As we noticed earlier, the Supreme Court was really concerned with laying down what was the meaning of the term " dividend " and whether it could be distributed in specie. It was further concerned with the value of the shares in the hands of the assessee and not the value of the shares in the hands of the company declaring the dividend. In this view of the matter in answering question No. 2 in I.T.Rs. Nos. 114 and 115 of 1972, we have to uphold the contention of the assessee as against the Revenue. In I.T.R. No. 209 of 1972, the answer to question No. 2 is dependent enti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates