TMI Blog2022 (2) TMI 647X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ;BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV PETITIONER: SRI K.R. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE AND SRI ANKUR PAI DHUNGAT, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT: SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE ORDER Petitioner has challenged the validity of the impugned draft assessment order dated 01.09.2021 passed by respondent No.1 at Annexure-G and has also called in question the validity of the impugned assessment order dated 21.10.2021 passed b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y had proceeded while rejecting the explanation regarding identity of the creditors. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in fact the material was made available to the Assessing Authority but due to technical glitch in the portal which is an admitted fact there were some difficulty relating to uploading the documents and that even though the documents were uploaded, due to tec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|