9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (7) TMI 1637X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h. K. Mohandas-DR ORDER Per Rajendra, A.M. Vide his application dt. 28.4.16 the Assessing Officer (A.O) has stated that certain mistakes have crept in the order of the Tribunal dt.4.11.15, that same are to be rectified as per the provisions of section 254(2) of the Act, that while deciding the 1st Ground, the Tribunal had adjudicated the issue against the assessee, that in the final result Trib ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er Ground No.2 the Ld.CIT(A) erred in allowing penal interest paid in the USA towards late payment of taxes paid of Rs. 4,61,683/-. 8. This issue is relatable to Ground No.1(supra).In view of our observation made with regard to that ground , Ground No.2 also stands allowed." 3.The AO , in his application, has further stated that there were mistakes in Ground No.3, that the ground was about allo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the provisions of section 254 of the Act. 5.We would like to reproduce the Ground 3 raised by the AO and same reads as under:- "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing software expenses u/s. 40(a)(i) on account of non deduction of TDS amounting Rs. 25,11,88,831/-". While deciding the appeal, the Tribunal at paragraph No.13 has decided the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
