9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (7) TMI 1225X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... necessary. The respondent shall not harass. The Criminal Original Petition stands disposed off. - Crl.O.P.No.7318 of 2022 - - - Dated:- 11-4-2022 - Honourable Mr. Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira For the Petitioners : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For the Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar, Special Public Prosecutor ORDER The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners during enquiry in connect on with the case in GST 3333BGIPD 2160D1Z3 of AKM Traders. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the 2nd petitioner is a Proprietrix of M/s.AKM Traders, having administrative office at No.29, Maruthi Nagar, Chinnakangarakuppam, Cuddalore, involved in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... seeking to direct the respondent not to harass. 4. The respondent have also filed their counter. It is useful to refer the relevant portion of the counter, which is extracted hereunder: 4. The Respondent submits that in his voluntary statement, Al admitted the liability and furnished the details of availed total in-eligible ITC of Rs.72,49,580/- (CGST@9% - Rs.33,48,067/- (Approx.), SGST @9% - Rs.33,48,067/- (Approx.) IGST @ 18% Rs.5,53,446/- (Approx.), on Inward supply of Total taxable value of Rs.4,02,75,441/-(Approx.), invoiced through fake invoices and other ineligible invoices. He undertook to reverse the same immediately with interest and penalty as applicable. 5. For confirmation of the payment and further facts evid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rization letter. No other SUMMON have been served to the Petitioner No.2. The Respondent submits that Petitioner 1 2 doesn't want to co-operate in the investigation proceeding and keeps on making false promises for making payment of self - calculated admitted ineligible availment of GST liability as detailed above in the light of records available in this office. In order to get immunity from the investigation proceeding all the allegation were made it is mere an exaggerated submission devoid of facts. A2 who is running the business but failed to appear in the official proceedings, if required that too of grave nature within the purview of Acts rules applicable. It is also submitted that Petitioner No.2 have never appeared in this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
