2018 (2) TMI 2079

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... business losses - HELD THAT:- Revenue, very fairly states that the issue raised herein stands concluded against the Revenue. This he states by the decision of this Court in the Respondent-Assessee s case for the assessment year 2006-07 reported in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Black Veatch Consulting (P.) Ltd. [ 2012 (4) TMI 450 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] and by the decision of the Apex Court in Commis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ive rise to any substantial question of law. Thus, not entertained.
M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant Mr. Hiten Chande, i/b PDS Legal, for the Respondent ORDER 1. Heard. 2. This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) challenges the order dated 2 December 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("Tribunal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sue raised herein stands concluded against the Revenue. This he states by the decision of this Court in the Respondent-Assessee's case for the assessment year 2006-07 reported in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Black & Veatch Consulting (P.) Ltd. (2012)20 taxmann.com 727 (Bom.) and by the decision of the Apex Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Yokogawa India Ltd. (2017)391 ITR 274. (b) I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X