Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (9) TMI 1115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... money deposited in the bank account operated by Late Shri Chotalal V. Doshi, belonged to the assessee. Accordingly, in light of the judgement cited above, we are hereby deleting the additions made by the Department. Appeal of assessee allowed.
Shri Waseem Ahmed , Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal , Judicial Member Assessee by : Shri Chetan Agarwal , A. R. Revenue by : Shri B. D. Gupta , Sr. D. R. ORDER PER BENCH : - ITA No. 55 / Rjt / 2021 Assessment Year 2011 - 12 This is an appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2011-12 against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 25-03- 2021, in DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2020-21/1031742706(1), in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short "the Act". 2 The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- "1) Ld. CIT(A) erred in law as well as on fact in confirming order passed by AO for reopening assessment u/s. 147 of the Act. 2) Ld. CIT(A) erred in law as well as in fact in confirming addition of Rs. 15,87,700/- only on the basis of allegation of third party without any evidences of any short and without considering our submission a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appellant that the said Dharmendra Doshi has not produced any evidence of persons depositing the cash in their accounts. It is claimed by the appellant the said Dharrnendra Doshi had entered the names of various persons only to avoid payments of tax on his own transactions. It is claimed that no liability should be fastened on him without any supporting evidence. The appellant also relied on various case judgements:- (a) Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. CIT 26 ITR 775 (SC) (b) Krishna Chand Chela Ram Vs. CIT 125 ITR 713 (SC) (c) Andaman Timber Industries Vs. CIT (2015) 62 Taxmann.com 3 (SC) (d) Ayubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Mharashtra & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 7728 of 2012 dated 08/11/2012) (e) Khem Chand Vs. Union of India (AIR 1958 SC 300) (f) Amitabh Bansal Vs. ITO Ward-46(4), [2019] 102 taxmann.com 229 (g) CIT Vs. Indrajit Singh Suri [2013] 33 taxmann.com 281 (Guj) (h) PCIT Vs. Kanubhai Maganlal Patel [2017] 79 taxmann.com 257 (Guj) (i) Late Harbhajan Singh Makkar Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) (ITA No. 2451/Del/2015 dated 16/10/2019) (j) State of MP Vs. Chintaman Sadashiv Vaishampayan (AIR 1961 SC 1623) 8.2 The various claims have been analysed. I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... have deposited cash and bank account of late Shri Chhota Lal Doshi (proprietor of Abhi Enterprises). In this regard, counsel for the assessee drew our attention to page 69 of the paper book, wherein Shri Dharmendra Doshi has stated "as have already stated that the amount deposited in said bank account was sales consideration of all businessmen of Jamnagar. I was just providing service to them on commission basis. I don't know about parties who have deposited the amount. Since the said amount represents out of books sales/sale consideration of businessmen of Jamnagar, hence liable to pay taxes on them". The counsel for the assessee relied upon the case of ACIT v. Lata Mangeshkar 97 ITR 696, wherein it was held that entries made in the accounts of third-party regarding payment to the assessee is not sufficient as there is no guarantee that the entries were genuine in absence of any corroborative evidence. The counsel for the assessee submitted that the statement of Shri Dharmendra Doshi was accepted by the ADIT at face value, without any further investigation about the veracity of the answers. In response, Ld. D.R. relied upon the observations made by the AO and CIT in their respecti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ors and assessee was one of them. On basis of said statement, Assessing Officer made addition of unexplained money to assessee's income. It was noted that said AGM could not even identify persons who brought money to him or denominations in which money was brought. Moreover, survey operations did not bring on record any acknowledgment/receipt in respect of money received from assessee. Further, said AGM could not substantiate his statements by bringing any other credible or corroborative evidence on record. Accordingly, the Tribunal held that in aforesaid circumstances, impugned addition made in hands of assessee deserved to be set aside. 6.2 In the case of Pradeep Amrutlal Runwal v. TRO [2014] 47 taxmann.com 293 (Pune - Trib.), during search proceedings in case of 'D Group', some loose papers were seized wherein certain amounts were written against name of assessee. The Assessing Officer made addition of said amount as undisclosed income in name of assessee. The ITAT held that since no evidence was found relating to existence of any transaction between assessee and 'D Group' and no corroborative evidence was found to suggest that assessee had actually received .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates