Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (9) TMI 239

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n: - "Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the assessment framed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was without jurisdiction as no notice under Section 143 (2) was served on the assessee within the prescribed time?" 4. Filing of paper book is dispensed with. 5. The Tribunal, in the order under appeal dated 23rd December, 2005, came to the conclusion that the notice dated 9th October, 1998 issued under Section 143 (2) of the Act was not served upon the assessee. The Tribunal relied upon an affidavit filed for the first time by the assessee before it in which the assessee denied receipt of the notice dated 9th October, 1998. The Tribunal concluded that since th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the presumption of service under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act. He further submits that in the appeal filed by the assessee before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), a ground has been taken to the effect that no notice dated 9th October, 1998 was served upon the assessee. He also submits that the fact that from 9th October, 1998 to 7th March, 2000 no proceedings were at all held by the Assessing Officer reinforces his position that the notice dated 9th October, 1998 was not served on the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee placed reliance on the judgments of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Hotline International (P) Limited [2008] 296 ITR 333; [2007] 211 CTR 207 and Commissioner of Income Tax v. Lunar Di .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of service. The affidavit denying service of notice was filed by the assessee only before the Tribunal. 12. In our view the Tribunal erred in placing reliance upon the affidavit filed rather belatedly to come to the conclusion that the assessee had successfully rebutted the presumption. Had such an affidavit been filed before the CIT (A) it is possible that the CIT (A) may have remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for making an appropriate enquiry. The assessee having let that opportunity go-by, it ought not to have been permitted by the Tribunal to rely on an affidavit filed at a time of the assessee's choosing. 13. We also find that the facts in the cases in which the two decisions referred to were rendered by this Court were qu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates