2003 (12) TMI 680

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No.2. Service of rule was waived by respondent No.1, who was personally present before the Court. The respondent No.1, the original complainant, who was personally present in the Court and who was identified by his identity card, submitted that he had no objection to the application being granted, in the sense that the petitioner may be relieved of the substantive sentence of imprisonment for s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 386 directly applied in the facts of the present case. Under the circumstances, it was submitted that extra-ordinary power and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Cr.P.C ought to be exercised to relieve the petitioner of the sentence by way of compounding of offence adopting an analogy of the provisions of Section 320 of the Cr.P.C, even though n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X