2020 (6) TMI 813

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l) For the Appellant:  Mr. Prakash K. Pandya, PCS For Respondent: None ORDER Heard the Learned Practising Company Secretary for the Appellant. This Appeal has been filed against Impugned Order dated 07th January, 2020 pronounced by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai in C.P. No. 1461/252/MB/2019. The Prayer of the Appeal is only challenging the portion of the Impugned .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h K. Pandya, Practising Company Secretary states that this Tribunal may substitute the costs imposed by any reasonable amount. 5. Going through the matter, it appears to us that in the facts of the case, in place of Rs. 7,00,000/-, costs should be Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only/- . In the Impugned Order, in place of "Rs. 7,00,000/-" read "Rs.1,50,000/-". 6. We make it clear that this Order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X