2020 (6) TMI 813

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pugned Order does not show as to why such a huge costs of Rs. 7 lakhs have been imposed. Mr. Prakash K. Pandya, Practising Company Secretary states that this Tribunal may substitute the costs imposed by any reasonable amount. Going through the matter, it appears to us that in the facts of the case, in place of Rs. 7,00,000/-, costs should be Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only/- . In the Impug .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at the Appellant was incorporated on 17th December, 1991 and the Appellant came to be struck off on 04th December, 2018 as it had not filed Annual Returns since incorporation. In Para 10 of the Impugned Order, the Restoration of the name of the Company was allowed subject to payment of costs Rs. 7 Lakhs. 3. In this matter, Notice was issued on the last date. We do not have the Respondent/RoC be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X