9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 1889X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... st the docket order dated 8.3.2016 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Nellore in IA No. 146 of 2016 in OS No. 177 of 2011. The case of the petitioner is that the signatures and the matter in the promissory note dated 20.2.2010 were filled up on different dates. He filed an Application seeking to send the same for scientific examination through experts. That Application came to be d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 91; K. Vairavan v. Selvaraj, 2012 Law Suit (Mad.) 1688; Selvaraj v. Kolandayee, 2013 Law Suit (Mad.) 1195; A. Thiyagarajan v. G. Ramachandran, 2014 Law Suit (Mad.) 2270; Dhanalakshmi Mills Ltd. v. R. Krishnamurthy and others, 2013 Law Suit (Mad.) 2533; R. Tharmambal v. V. Christopher Moni Prakash, 2012 Law Suit (Mad.) 2538 and V. Makesan v. T. Dhanalakshmi, 2010 Law Suit (Mad.) 3979, wherein takin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er was to be considered, on account of the impracticability involved, it would be only a futile exercise. In that view of the matter, the order of the lower Court does not call for any interference. Therefore, this civil revision petition is liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the miscellaneous petit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
