9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (1) TMI 619X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... proper since he did not provide reasonable opportunity for submitting Revised Audit Report, as the Revised Audit Report was submitted on 09.08.2022 II. For that the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) did not consider that the amount of Bonus mentioned in Form 3CB to the tune of Rs.11,85,326/- was by mistake. The correct figure was given in the Balance Sheet as Rs.4,15,300/- and the appellant had revised the Audit Report reflecting the said amount of Rs.4,15,300/- which was submitted on 8/8/2022 and hence disallowance of the entire amount of Rs. 11,85,326/- is not proper and cannot be maintainable in law more particularly when the Form 3CB has been revised and the appellant did not get reasonable opportunity to submit the same. III. For that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ccount. Aggrieved against this the assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(Appeals), who also dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 3. Apropos to ground nos. 1 & 2, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(Appeals) did not provide adequate opportunity to the assessee and further submitted that the learned CIT(Appeals) failed to appreciate the fact that the amount of bonus mentioned in form no. 3CB to the tune of Rs. 11,85,326/- was by mistake. The correct figure was given in the balance-sheet at Rs. 4,15,300/- and the appellant had revised the audit report reflecting the said amount Rs. 4,15,300/- which was submitted on 8.8.2022. Learned counsel subm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and supported the orders of the authorities below. 9. I find that the learned CIT(Appeals) has decided by observing as under: "4.1 Ground No. 1 relates to disallowance u/s 36(1 )(ii) of the Act. Perusal of intimation order reveals that the appellant had declared income from BoP at Rs. 2,42,898/- and the CPC has assessed it at Rs. 14,28,124/- resulting into addition of Rs. 11,85,226/-. In the intimation order, a variance of Rs. 11,85,226/- has been identified in Annexure-OI at clause 6(c) on a/c of "any sum paid to an employee as bonus or commission for service rendered, where such sum was otherwise payable to him as profit or dividend[36(1)(ii)J'. This variance is due to non-disallowance by the appellant in ITR in view of qualification ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it report/audited financial statement. So the proper course of action in this matter should be to ask the auditor to e-file revised tax audit report/audited financial statement and then take a proper course of action. Since the appellant neither furnished any revised tax audit report nor a certificate from concerned CA in support of his contention, the AO/CPC's action of disallowance on the basis of information available in ITR and TAR is hereby sustained. Thus, this ground of appeal is dismissed. 4.2 Ground No. 2 relates to denial of deduction of Rs. 5,632/- of saving bank interest under chapter VIA. Perusal of Income Tax Return reveals that the appellant has declared interest income from saving bank account at Rs. 5,632/- under the hea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
