9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 39X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... only filed a set of documents containing written submissions, balance sheets etc. – as per CEGAT (Procedure), the documents filed by the appellants did not conform to the requirements of an application - Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeals for non-compliance of the provisions of Section 129 E of the Customs Act, 1962. - Cus. A.A 7/08 and others - - - Dated:- 15-12-2008 - Cus. A.A 8/08 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 008 in CUS. A. A. 8/2008, CM 17572/2008 in CUS. A. A. 9/2008, CM 17574/2008 in CUS. A. A. 10/2008, CM 17576/2008 in CUS. A. A. 11/2008, CM 17578/2008 in CUS. A. A. 12/2008 (for exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CUS. A. A. 7/2008 and CM 17567/2008, CUS. A. A. 8/2008 and CM 17569/2008, CUS. A. A. 9/2008 and CM 17571/2008, CUS. A. A. 10/2008 and CM 17573/2008, CUS. A. A. 11/2008 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y not have been there before the Tribunal in the first round with regard to the financial hardship. The learned counsel for the appellants had stated that the applications would be moved before the Tribunal within three weeks along with all the materials and documents. We had directed the Tribunal to dispose of all such applications, if made within the said period of three weeks, after giving the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , the documents filed by the appellants did not conform to the requirements of an application. Consequently, the Tribunal, after holding that there were no applications on record inasmuch as the same were not in accordance with the Rules, particularly, as the same did not contain any verification, decided that the appeals themselves were liable to be dismissed for non-compliance of the provisions ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
