2008 (7) TMI 254

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... per S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - By the impugned order the Commissioner has confirmed duty demand of Rs. 9,58,320/- for not performing the export obligation and for non-fulfilment of conditions stipulated in various conditions of export bonds executed by the appellant. The appellant's contention is that they have partly complied with the terms of the export orders and have already deposited certai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... L.T.284 (Tri.-Bang.) (d) Bluegold Maritech (International) Ltd. v. CC, Guntur - 2007 (207) E.L.T.397 (Tri.-Bang.). 2. The learned Counsel submits that the machineries are not required to be examined for the purpose of working out the depreciation of the machinery. She submits that the date of expiry of bonding period should not be taken for calculating the depreciation. She prayed for grant of d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es and their conditions is not necessary for the purpose of working out the depreciation. The value of the machinery has already been worked out in the Show Cause Notice at Rs. 37,20,198/- and duty has been worked out at Rs. 9,58,320/-. The cited judgments have clearly laid down that on failure to comply with the export obligation, the appellants are required to discharge the duty liability. It ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X