9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (8) TMI 1375X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pplication was filed by the Appellant i.e. I.A. No. 406 of 2022 in March, 2022 however the said Application was firstly rejected in his absence and secondly on an request to revive the Application the same was dismissed on the ground of no locus and holding that there is no merit. No reasons have been given in the Order impugned as to how the Appellant has no locus. When the Application for app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For Respondent: Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Sumit Shukla, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karan Valecha, Ms. Rajshree Choudhary, Advocates for R-2 ORDER Heard Learned Sr. Counsel for the Appellant-Mr. Gopal Jain and Learned Sr. Counsel-Mr. Ramji Srinivasan along with Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Advocate appearing for the Respondents. 2. This Appeal has been f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... we do not find any merit or locus of present applicant . Assailing these two Orders, this Appeal has been filed. 3. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate submits that Applicant has raised substantial grounds in his Application to assail the approval of the plan of the Successful Resolution Applicant including the Member of Committee of Creditors was related party. He submits that the request of the Appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Appellant i.e. I.A. No. 406 of 2022 in March, 2022 however the said Application was firstly rejected in his absence and secondly on an request to revive the Application the same was dismissed on the ground of no locus and holding that there is no merit. No reasons have been given in the Order impugned as to how the Appellant has no locus. 7. Learned Counsel for the parties have submitted that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
