2023 (5) TMI 1149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... KUMAR PATI , MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) Shri V. Rama Rao , Advocate for the Appellant Shri P. K. Acharya , Superintendent , alongwith Shri Xavier R. Mascarenhas , Superintendent , Authorised Representative for the Respondent ORDER PER : Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati Denial of exemption Notification No. 89/95-CE dated 18.05.1995 by which excisable goods, being waste generated during the preparation of final .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d the same, suffered adjudication that confirmed duty demand interest and penalty, preferred appeal that was rejected for non-payment of pre-deposit as determined by the Commissioner (Appeals), got remand order from the CESTAT for redetermination of appeal and ultimately lost his claims in both the appeals as the Commissioner (Appeals) had confirmed the duty demand etc. Vide his above referred ord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a different period, Appellant's appeal was allowed by this Tribunal in extending benefit of exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE and holding that the same would apply to the waste namely Gums & Recovered Oil etc. The same issue is also settled in the case of M/s. Ricela Health Foods Ltd cited supra by the Larger Bench of this Tribunal. Further the issue has attended finality by rejection of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X