9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (1) TMI 89X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... acts and contentions in detail, except for taking note of the fact that the amount in dispute in the present appeal is a sum of Rs.47,32,090 - Appeal is dismissed - 752 of 2008 - - - Dated:- 12-1-2009 - D. A. MEHTA and SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, JJ. Mr. S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate, with T.P. Hemani, with Mrs Swati Soparkar, Advocates for the Appellant None for the respondents. ORDER ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the ITAT was not perverse in as much as: deciding the appeal by merely following the case in ITA 872/2007. No independent finding given for deciding the appeal all the details were filed before the Tribunal and the same ought to have been looked into and decided the appeal; restoring the appeal to Assessing Officer to find out the peak which ought to have been decided. Thereafter, the foll ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ear 2003-2004. Hence, for the sake of brevity, it is not necessary to repeat the facts and contentions in detail, except for taking note of the fact that the amount in dispute in the present appeal is a sum of Rs.47,32,090/-. For the same reasons, stated in order of even date in case of Nirikesha N Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, in Tax Appeal No.751 of 2008, this appeal is also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
