9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (7) TMI 103X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ase the matter on 11.05.2023 - We are of the view that thereafter the matter was required to be handed over to another Bench, more so, in the manner it has proceeded even thereafter, simply being assigned to the same Bench and thereafter being concluded on that date by the same Bench. The appellant has been in custody for 16 years 9 months and 18 days (as on 09.04.2023). Despite the opposition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inal Appeal No.3832/2014 was concluded on 04.08.2022 and in view thereof the prayer of the petitioner for bail was not attended to. The judgment was reserved on the said date but the order of 04.08.2022 has neither been uploaded online nor has been made available to the petitioner. The petitioner has already completed 16 years 9 months and 18 days in actual custody. The Registrar of the Allahab ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... delivery of judgment on 19.5.2023. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in terms of the judgment in Anil Rai v. State of Bihar (2001) 7 SCC 318, it has been observed that if a judgment is not pronounced within a period of six months, it should be placed before another Bench for fresh arguments. In the facts of the present case, when we called for the details arising from non-uplo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r. Vs. The State of Maharashtra Ors. where reasons were not made available for nine months after passing of the operative portion of the order. We had directed that it was in the fitness of things that the matter be re-heard by another Bench. We had thus, issued directions in the aforesaid terms. We may notice that the appellant has been in custody for 16 years 9 months and 18 days (as on 09 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
