9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (8) TMI 231X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... voices were not in the name of the appellants but were in the name of a Welfare Committee, therefore, appellant are not eligible to avail Cenvat credit – stay not granted - ST/190-192/2008 - 771-773/2008 - Dated:- 5-8-2008 - Dr. S.L. Peeran, Member (J) and Shri T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) Shri G.P. Sastry, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. Joy Kumari Chander, JCDR, for the Respondent. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... DR who points that the invoices were not in the name of the appellants but were in the name of a Welfare Committee. She submits that in terms of the rules; they are not eligible to avail Cenvat credit on service tax paid in respect of those services. 3. We have carefully considered the submissions. We do not find any merit in the stay application, as Prima facie, they are not eligible to avail ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
