2009 (4) TMI 90

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ts are not before Supreme Court, so entitlement to benefit of Scheme is not clear - record of the case of Designated Authority is also not before SC - Even the counter affidavit filed before HC has not been placed on record - impugned judgment of the HC and the order of Designated Authority set aside – matter remanded to concerned Authority to decide this case de novo and expeditiously - 2250 of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 724928 dt. 27-2-96 along with other relevant documents. On examination of the documents, the Designated Authority rejected the claim of the appellant on the ground that the goods were manufactured under loan licence and the same was not covered under the category of manufacture exporter and the benefit of the Scheme were available only for manufacturer exporter. 4. The appellant aggrieved by t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vo after hearing learned counsel for the parties without being influenced by the observations of the courts below. 7. Since the matter has been pending for quite some time, we request the concerned Authority to decide the matter as expeditiously as possible in any event within six months from the date of communication of this order. All issues are left open. This appeal is, accordingly, dispos .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X