2022 (9) TMI 1502

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he High Court, after no relief had been granted in a previous IA, was manifestly an abuse of the process. On these grounds, we see no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition. However, it needs to be clarified that the observations in the impugned order of the High Court are confined to the issue as to whether the Single Judge was justified in declining to exercise the discretion in an ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... galdas Aor, AOR ORDER 1. We have heard Mr Ashwani Kumar, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the second respondent and Mr Mukul Rohatgi, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent. 2. From the facts which have emerged before this Court, it is apparent that the Single Judge of the High Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ever, it needs to be clarified that the observations in the impugned order of the High Court are confined to the issue as to whether the Single Judge was justified in declining to exercise the discretion in an application for the grant of ad interim relief. 4. Subject to the aforesaid clarification, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. 5. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X