9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (4) TMI 98X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 21.04.2006 passed in ITA No.189/Mds/2005 in respect of the assessment year 2000-01. 2. The assessee filed its return for the assessment year 2000-01. The Assessing Officer granted MAT credit after calculating the interest under Section 234B and 234 C. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed an appeal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ance tax paid? 2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the MAT credit can be given priority of set off against tax payable, contrary to the scheme of Schedule G of Form 1? 3. Whether the interest under Section 234 B and 234 C had to be calculated after giving the MAT credit against the tax payable on the basis of normal computation? 3. We heard the arguments of the learned counsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oning given by the Delhi High Court. The learned counsel appearing for the revenue has not produced any materials or given compelling reasons to take a contrary view with that of the Delhi High Court. In such circumstances, we answer the first question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 5. In respect of the 1st and 2nd questions of law, the Division Bench has observed as follows:- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not find any error or illegality in the order of the Tribunal so as to warrant interference. Accordingly, we answer the questions 2 and 3 also in favour of the assessee and as against the Revenue. Thus all the questions of law have been answered against the revenue in favour of the assessee. 6. The questions of law in this case also are identical as the one considered by the Division Benc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
