TMI Blog2023 (11) TMI 23X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the contention on alternate remedy because Respondent No.2 (Adjudicating authority) has not even examined the merits of the case when there was a binding order of CESTAT in the case of Bayer [ 2015 (11) TMI 943 - CESTAT MUMBAI ] and allowed the writ Petion - HELD THAT:- On facts, the High Court was right in exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|